On January 21, 2021, the day after President
Biden took his oath of office a newly published author, Lindsay Chervinsky, posted an
article with the title, Most
Republican Lawmakers Have Failed John Quincy Adams – and The Constitution.
Overall, it’s worth looking at. There is, however, a problem in the second
paragraph where it states:
In March 1825, President-Elect John Quincy Adams broke with tradition
and used
a book of laws at his inauguration. He selected the book of laws, rather
than a bible, so that he would be taking the oath of office on the Constitution
of the United States. JQA’s model serves as a helpful reminder of how elected
officials should act,
and reminds us how far most Republican lawmakers have strayed from that high
standard.
The problem with saying “John Quincy
Adams broke with tradition” is that it’s not true. John Quincy Adams did not
break with tradition when he “read
the oath of office from of a Volume of Laws.” In doing so, he actually
chose to follow the model set by George Washington’s second inauguration that
took place in Philadelphia.
The precedent setting nature of
Washington’s second inauguration is evident by thoroughly examining the March
1, 1793 - Cabinet Opinion on the
Administration of the Presidential Oath, where there’s no mention of
a Bible. In addition, the Philadelphia
newspapers describing Washington’s second inauguration failed to mention a
Bible, or offer any commentary on how federal Justice Cushing administered the
presidential oath of office by selecting a text from which he read
the presidential oath “rather
than a bible.”
The fact is that all reliable firsthand
accounts, describing presidential inaugurations from George Washington’s second
inauguration through to the 1825 inauguration of John Quincy Adams, fail to
mention a Bible. The so-called “JQA’s
model” was not established by John Quincy Adams. That distinction belongs to
George Washington starting at his second inauguration.
It’s only after Washington’s second
inauguration and the next eight presidential inaugural ceremonies, a span of 36
years, where we find a president who broke with Washington’s no-Bible
tradition. This break occurred at Andrew Jackson’s inauguration of March 4,
1829, where a District of Columbia Marshal appeared on the scene, and presented
Andrew Jackson with a Bible. Here’s a snippet from a letter,
dated March 11, 1829, written by Margaret Bayard Smith that describes the
scene:
An almost
breathless silence, succeeded [as Jackson
started his speech] and the multitude was still, — listening to catch the
sound of his voice, tho’ it was so low, as to be heard only by those nearest to
him. After reading his speech, the oath was administered to him by [John
Marshall] the Chief Justice. The Marshal presented the Bible. The
President took it from his hands, pressed his lips to it, laid it reverently
down, then bowed again to the people —Yes, to the people in all their majesty.
. . .”
So, when we examine contemporary reports
covering the time of our early presidents, it’s Andrew Jackson, not John Quincy
Adams, who broke with the tradition of not using a Bible when swearing the
presidential oath.
1 comment:
Andrew Jackson was following Jefferson's very thin constitutional line re religion between what is permissible in the FEDERAL government and what is left to the states. [Jefferson himself issued a religious proclamation as Virginia governor.]
Nor is it necessarily the only valid interpretation of the First Amendment, and certainly the current crop of secularists have gone far beyond the Jefferson-Jackson line in trying to denude the public square of the Deity.
https://www.religion-online.org/article/beyond-separation-of-church-and-state/
Post a Comment