....I look forward to the book and hope that it is as impactful as his first.
I was revisiting some things and realized that I never answered your criticism that I did not include Richard Price in my first book.My standards for who to include in the influences section were: a) for influences on political leaders, I only included those named by the political leaders themselves as their influences; b) for influences on the preachers, I only included Americans – those living in America.Price was a Welshman/Englishman and was not identified by any of my eight guys as an influence on them. I do not deny that he was influential, but I kept it to those named by the key Founders.As with the definition of Christianity that I used [using the definition that the 18th-century American churches used], I didn’t want critics to question whether the people I identified actually influenced the respective political leaders. You can’t argue with it when they themselves say they were influenced by them.Incidentally, I have another book at the publisher that is due out in October. It is a study of the political thought of the Loyalist clergy – i.e. the arguments against the Revolution made by the American clergymen who stayed loyal to Great Britain. They covered all areas/fields of argument against the Revolution: biblical, legal, theoretical, practical, rational.....
A group blog to promote discussion, debate and insight into the history, particularly religious, of America's founding. Any observations, questions, or comments relating to the blog's theme are welcomed.
Friday, March 16, 2018
Frazer Updates
Gregg Frazer sent me the following note, that serves as an update:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Benjamin Rush asked Price to keep his heterodox views on theology quiet to avoid putting a cloud over his other thoughts on politics and education.
Post a Comment