And for all Fischer’s talk of Story thinking Christianity was the only thing protected by the First Amendment, Fischer would certainly not consider Story a Christian himself. Story’s brother William wrote his biography, which included this from a letter he wrote to Story’s son:
“After my continued absence from home for four or five years, we met again, your father being now about eighteen years old, and renewed our former affection towards each other. At this time we were, from a similarity of sentiment, drawn more closely together. I allude particularly to our religious opinions. We frequently discussed the subject of the divinity and the humanity of Christ, and we both agreed in believing in his humanity. Thus you see that your father and myself were early Unitarians, long before the doctrine was preached among us by any one…This faith he retained during his whole life, and was ever ardent in his advocacy of the views of Liberal Christians. He was several times President of the American Unitarian Association…He admitted within the pale of salvation Mahommedan and Christian, Catholic and Infidel. He believed that whatever is sincere and honest is recognized of God.”So Story believed that Jesus was only a man and he was both a unitarian and a universalist (though not a Unitarian Universalist, which did not exist at the time). Fischer would condemn him as a heretic and an infidel and claim that he himself was not protected by the First Amendment.
A group blog to promote discussion, debate and insight into the history, particularly religious, of America's founding. Any observations, questions, or comments relating to the blog's theme are welcomed.
Saturday, November 22, 2014
More Great Stuff From Ed Brayton
Check out him on a politician spreading a false quotation from George Washington and another take down of Bryan Fischer. From the latter.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Ed has to stoop pretty low to find someone he can beat. Strictly minor league.
Tom Van Dyke writes, "Ed has to stoop pretty low to find someone he can beat . . .
If this were true, you'd either be able to find debates where Ed's been crushed or convincingly rebut arguments he's made. Please provide cites and then validate how Ed must "stoop pretty low" in order to beat anyone.
Otherwise this is just one more incident of Tom Van Dyke's Brayton Derangement Syndrome.
Ed's a polemicist with no actual thesis to defend. His game is to find the dumbest MFer he can on the right to find someone to be superior to.
Which means digging pretty low, as we see here with Bryan Fischer.
Tom,
Repeating bald assertions while failing to provide validation is not a compelling argument. More evidence of Brayton Derangement Syndrome.
I also suggest you look up the actual meaning of polemicist since it certainly doesn't apply here. I.e., rebutting absurd arguments with sufficiently framed facts as Ed does with Bryan Fischer is not the behavior of a polemicist.
Bryan Fisher's a ninny. Even you could beat him.
Post a Comment