Friday, February 19, 2010

Gary Scott Smith on "How Christian Were the Founders?"

Check it out here.

A taste:

Conservative Christian authors such as David Barton, Peter Marshall Jr., and Tim LaHaye contend that most of the founders were devout Christians who sought to establish a Christian nation. Isaac Kramnick and R. Laurence Moore in “The Godless Constitution” and Brooke Allen in “Moral Minority: Our Skeptical Founding Fathers” counter that very few founders were orthodox Christians. They and others often generalize from famous founders, such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Thomas Paine, to argue that most founders were deists who wanted strict separation of church and state.

The truth lies between these two positions. Almost every major founder belonged to a Christian congregation, although a sizable number of them were not committed Christians whose faith strongly influenced their political philosophy and actions. Two recent books edited by Daniel Dreisbach, Jeffry Morrison, and Mark David Hall—“The Founders on God and Government” and “The Forgotten Founders on Religion and Public Life”—carefully explained the religious backgrounds, convictions, and contributions of numerous founders. They show that many who played leading roles in the nation’s Declaration of Independence, the Continental Congress, and the devising and ratification of the Constitution were devout Christians, as evident in their church attendance, commitment to prayer and Bible reading, belief in God’s direction of earthly affairs, and conduct....

Even many of those often labeled as deists—Washington, Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and Alexander Hamilton—do not fit the standard definition of deism, which asserts that after creating the world, God has had no more involvement with it. Deism views God as a transcendent first cause who is not immanent, triune, fully personal, or sovereign over human affairs. All of these founders, however, repeatedly discussed God’s providence and frequently affirmed the value of prayer. Their conviction that God intervened in human affairs and directed history has led some scholars to call these founders “warm” or “enlightened” deists, but these terms seem like oxymorons. A better label for their position is theistic rationalism. As Professor Gregg Frazer explains, this hybrid belief system combines elements of “natural religion, Protestant Christianity, and rationalism—with rationalism as the controlling element.” Those espousing this perspective believed in a powerful, benevolent Creator who established the laws by which the universe operates. They also believed that God answered prayer, that people best served Him by living a moral life, and that individuals would be rewarded or punished in the afterlife based on their earthly deeds. Only a few founders, most notably Thomas Paine and Ethan Allan, can properly be called deists.


Tom Van Dyke said...

"As Professor Gregg Frazer explains, this hybrid belief system combines elements of 'natural religion, Protestant Christianity, and rationalism—with rationalism as the controlling element.'"

Heh. Apparently Professor Frazer knows little about non-Protestant Christianity, since it's quite "rational."

Otherwise, I pretty much agree with Gary Scott Smith here. But you can't get to the American Founding without medieval Western philosophy, which came before there even was a Protestant Reformation. It's the hole in Smith and Frazer's donut.

Anonymous said...

From the quotes I've seen, I think a good majority of the founders were agnostic.
The Atheist Perspective

Joe Winpisinger said...

Tom got to the "hole in Frazer's donut" before I did. His whole idea assumes that Christianity is not rational and had been corrupted. Theistic Rationalist as a term ignores Thousands of years of Christian thinking that saw not tension between being a Christian and rational. See Thomas Aquinas and his devotees in Salmanca, Spain. If the Bible has nothing to say about rights and the Enlightenment was the first movement to expound on this then what were they doing arguing for the rights of Native Americans and setting up governments like the one in Aragon where the King ruled on by the will of the people?