Barruel’s own parts of the book are perfectly the ravings of a Bedlamite. But he quotes largely from Wishaupt whom he considers as the founder of what he calls the order. As you may not have had an opportunity of forming a judgment of this cry of 'mad dog' which has been raised against his doctrines, I will give you the idea I have formed from only an hour’s reading of Barruel’s quotations from him, which you may be sure are not the most favorable. Wishaupt seems to be an enthusiastic Philanthropist.
He is among those (as you know the excellent Price and Priestley also are) who believe in the indefinite perfectibility of man.
Indeed, Jefferson saw in such Freemasons folks who preached the same kind of religious principles in which he believed. He even compared "Wishaupt" to his spiritual mentor, Joseph Priestly, and Richard Price, another British unitarian who strongly influenced Jefferson and America's key Whig Founders. Note, they believed "in the indefinite perfectibility of man," which is not consistent with orthodox Christianity because it denies original sin. Neither is Locke's notion of a tabla rasa or "blank state" for human nature (or at least for the human mind).
Jefferson continues on "Wishaupt":
Wishaupt believes that to promote this perfection of the human character was the object of Jesus Christ. That his intention was simply to reinstate natural religion, & by diffusing the light of his morality, to teach us to govern ourselves. His precepts are the love of god & love of our neighbor. And by teaching innocence of conduct, he expected to place men in their natural state of liberty & equality. He says, no one ever laid a surer foundation for liberty than our grand master, Jesus of Nazareth. He believes the Free Masons were originally possessed of the true principles & objects of Christianity, & have still preserved some of them by tradition, but much disfigured.
Though I've never read Adam Weishaupt's work, this is exactly what Jefferson, after Joseph Priestly, believed about Jesus and Christianity freed from its "corruptions" (i.e., the tenets of orthodoxy that distinguish it). Jesus was a man, not God, and a great moral teacher who preached "natural religion," -- a sort of universalistic ethical monotheism that man can discover from reason.
This also shows that when Madison, for instance, referred to Christianity as the "best & purest religion," it by no means pointed towards his belief in orthodox Christianity as such contention perfectly parallels Jefferson's above quoted heterodox thoughts. This is why James H. Hutson noted about that quotation:
This last assertion, however, sounds very much like the deistical maxim, frequently indulged by Jefferson, that the "pure" religion of Jesus had been unconscionably corrupted by the apostle Paul and the early church fathers.
Jefferson continues on Weishaupt:
The means he proposes to effect this improvement of human nature are 'to enlighten men, to correct their morals & inspire them with benevolence. Secure of our success, sais he, we abstain from violent commotions. To have foreseen the happiness of posterity & to have prepared it by irreproachable means, suffices for our felicity. The tranquility of our consciences is not troubled by the reproach of aiming at the ruin or overthrow of states or thrones.'
As Wishaupt lived under the tyranny of a despot & priests, he knew that caution was necessary even in spreading information, & the principles of pure morality. He proposed therefore to lead the Free masons to adopt this object & to make the objects of their institution the diffusion of science & virtue. He proposed to initiate new members into his body by gradations proportioned to his fears of the thunderbolts of tyranny.
This has given an air of mystery to his views, was the foundation of his banishment, the subversion of the masonic order, & is the colour for the ravings against him of Robinson, Barruel & Morse, whose real fears are that the craft would be endangered by the spreading of information, reason, & natural morality among men.
It's a wonder why Jefferson never joined the Freemasons as he saw them as teaching exactly what he believed in.
6 comments:
Adam Weishaupt founded the Illuminati, who wanted to destroy all religions and take over the world. Washington, as a traditional Freemason, hated his guts.
More here.
Weishaupt was Jefferson's favorite kind of wackjob.
Aha. An old post of mine.
Very interesting. Yes that well illustrates the diversity in the Freemasons. Ironic in that Jefferson, not even a member, lauds the more extreme and heterodox elements of Freemasonry (as no doubt Paine, another non-memember did) than the official Freemason GW did.
President Washington let Paine stew in prison for his rabble-rousing during the French Revolution. Among other reasons. [James Madison got him out.]
A fascinating historical essay on the Paine-Washington matter, by Bertrand Russell in 1934.
Thank you for sharing such information. I thought Jefferson was a freemason. Now i know what's the truth. Keep posting articles of this kinds.
Thanks for sharing the information. It is very interesting..
I noticed the comment that "it is surprising Jefferson never joined the Masons as they believed what he believed". (Paraphrasing).
Quite possible Jefferson could not join the Masons because his parents did not belong to the organization. Considering how many of our Fore Fathers were Free Masons (and many POTUS after them) it would not be surprising at all that Jefferson would have close connections to them.
So, unless one's parents were Freemasons, there is no way a person can join their secret organization. My guess is Jefferson would have joined if he could.
Post a Comment