Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Patent Nonsense



One of Thomas Jefferson’s lesser known contributions to the republic was as first chief of the U.S. Patent Office.


Known for his own ingenious inventions—like a revolving bookcase and a duplicator he called the “polygraph” that was the eighteenth century version of a Xerox machine--in 1790 he was tasked with creating a system that would encourage the development of useful contraptions.


For Jefferson, the emphasis was on “useful.” He was less interested in protecting an abstract right to “intellectual property” than in fostering a climate where good ideas could flourish. Public utility trumped private gain.


In a letter he wrote in 1813 to Isaac McPherson, Jefferson ruminated that “It has been pretended by some, (and in England especially,) that inventors have a natural and exclusive right to their inventions, and not merely for their own lives, but inheritable to their heirs. But … If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea.”


Ideas were essentially free, self-propagating, and could not be restrained once brought to birth.


So Jefferson’s own inventions, like an improved plow mathematically designed to offer least resistance in breaking through the soil, were never patented. He was less motivated by hope for riches than by desire to benefit humanity.


Today most patents runs twenty years, roughly a generation, while copyrights can last a hundred years or longer (the author’s lifetime plus fifty years). Many would say that’s too long to keep cheap generic drugs off the market, or to give an author or musician a monopoly on their creations.


Thomas Jefferson would agree. Patent laws should create enough profit incentive to spur inventors. But when they impoverish the many to enrich the few, that’s just patent nonsense.

5 comments:

Jonathan Rowe said...

It's actually up to 70 that is life plus 70 of the author.

Christian Salafia said...

Intellectual property was such a big deal, it was included in Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution.

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

bpabbott said...

Regarding Article I Section 8, does anyone know of the specifics regarding the nature of the founders motives / intent?

jimmiraybob said...

BPA,

I recently read some comments on To Provide for the General Welfare: A History of the Federal Spending Power, 2004 by Theodore Sky, that makes me think that it provides some fair coverage of Washington, Hamilton, Madison and Jefferson and how they viewed Article I Section 8 and how they applied it when they had to.

It's available at Google Books for review, which might contain enough info to start getting some flavor.

susana said...

Thats very nice article thanks for information...
___________________
Susana
Get Payday Loan in 4 easy steps