What follows
are two segments taken from the 1/18/2013
C-Span video transcript that was recorded at the Washington Center for Internships &
Academic Seminars. It starts off with the host, Ross K.
Baker, introducing the featured speaker for that day, Donald
A. Ritchie, whom he presents as the
best example of a “go to guy.”
All
right, now, there is a phrase that journalists use a lot. It’s called a “go to
guy,” and I think you know what that means. It means somebody who knows a lot
about something that a journalist can go to, and get from that person reliable
information. There are not that many “go to guys” around. There are a lot of
people in this town of opinions, and a lot of people in this town who are
incredibly glib. There are not that many people who are so fundamentally immersed in a
subject and an important subject that journalists and others - academics – are attracted to that person.
In my
mind, the best example of a “go to guy” is our next speaker, Don Ritchie. I’ve
gone to him and more than that. I’ve received ideas even a little bit of
inspiration in terms of my own work. He is the historian of the United States
Senate and as such he is the keeper of the Family Jewels of the history of the
United States Senate. It’s glorious, interesting, fractious cooperative
history. I’ve known Don for many years as I’ve known his predecessor [Richard
A. Baker] and I’m so pleased to have him here to talk about the Senate
today so much as about Inaugurations which after all is the reason why we’re
all here. So it’s my great pleasure to present Historian of the United States
Senate.
When, during the course of Don
Ritchie’s presentation on Past
Inaugurations, he came to the part about explaining how the traditional
use of the extra-constitutional
phrase, “So help me God,” has become a topic of such paramount importance, he
had this to say:
Now one of the strange things about
the inaugurations and one that leads to controversy
is that as I mentioned that the Constitution writes out the oath of office. And
one thing the Constitution does not say is concluding the inaugural oath with
“So help me God.” And yet most presidents [beginning
with Chester A. Arthur] say “So help me God.” And part of that is because there was a
tradition; there was sort of a folklore that developed that Washington said “So
help me God.” And we historians have been looking for whether Washington
said or didn’t say “So help me God.” We’re
not sure about this one. One of the accounts [first told
by Rufus Griswold was seemingly] given by Washington
Irving, who was five-year-old at the time of Washington’s inauguration,
[...] But [sixty-five] years later he
gave his remembrance that Washington said “So help me God.” We just don’t know.
It’s up to the President of the
United States to say whatever he wants. [It’s
been suggested that according to a common practice,] [m]ost presidents in the 19th Century did
not repeat the oath, they
just said, ”I do.” Starting about
the 1880’s presidents began to say “So help me God.” It’s interesting to me that the Chief Justice
who swears them in says “So help me God.” If you’re going to be a strict
interpreter of the constitution, it’s not there. The President can say it. You
wonder why the Chief Justice puts this in. It’s become tradition, and
tradition is even more important that constitutional structure in this process.
But it’s become a point of controversy.
I should say that Chief justices of
the United States have been known to fumble
the oath of office. It’s different than all the others, and one reason why
they do fumble is they are used to giving the oath, but it’s not the same oath.
The oath we take as staff of the Senate,
or the military
offices, or the judges
take is the oath
written by Congress, and that oath does end with “So help me God.” And in fact, the military oath that
Washington’s troops [took] during the
Revolution ended with So help me God . So it was natural for Washington to have
said it at that occasion, although not required [my italics].
As for the actual “military oath
that Washington’s troops took during the Revolution,” Senate Historian Don
Ritchie fumbled this one away, because he is totally unaware of the need to
piece together the February 7, 1778 act of the Continental Congress with
Washington’s subsequent General Orders of May 7, 1778.
So, now, here’s the real scoop.
At the outset of the Revolutionary War, the Continental Congress
established loyalty oaths for both men and officers who had enlisted into
Continental Army.
The first such oath was put into effect on October 21, 1776, but this version
with its concluding So help me God was repealed. A revised oath
took its place on February 3, 1778, but at this time an apparently minor
change took place. In contrast to the earlier
version the usual So help me God did not occur within a delimiting pair
of quotations marks. (Unfortunately, this apparently minor change is frequently
unnoticed, i.e. U.S. Army Center of Military History
website, Oaths of Enlistment and
Oaths of Office.)
You
can see a broadside containing the original February 3, 1778 legislation at a
website provided by The Library of
Congress – American Memory as shown here.
Here’s
another source, Public
Papers of George Clinton, First Governor of New York, 1777-1795, 1801 ..., pgs, 703-707, that shows the same.
If the matter concerning the Continental Army military oath with its
trailing So help me God tagline was
limited to the placement of a single quotation mark, then this matter would
hardly be worth mentioning. What follows, however, is significant.
According to the GENERALORDERS - Head Quarters, V. Forge, Thursday, May 7, 1778, issued
by Commanding General George Washington,
So help me God was taken out
of the military oath. Consequently, when
the printed military oath certificates were distributed to the officers
in the field, the printed oath stopped at the final quotation mark, and it
did not include the apparently unnecessary So help me God tagline.
It was five days later on May 12th that George Washington’s
signed his oath certificate as specified
by the General Orders of May 7, 1778. As I’ve previously shown (see here, and here) Washington did not append So help me God.
Now with this particular historical background kept in mind, is it all reasonable for the “go to guy,” Don Ritchie, to peddle the notion that it was “natural for Washington to have said it [So help me God] at that occasion, although not required ”?
Now with this particular historical background kept in mind, is it all reasonable for the “go to guy,” Don Ritchie, to peddle the notion that it was “natural for Washington to have said it [So help me God] at that occasion, although not required ”?
3 comments:
Good spadework, Ray.
"Fumbles" is unfair and contentious, however, since "so help me God" was indeed said by Washington's troops. It was simply deleted a couple years later--and likely because of the prohibition of oaths by certain Christian sects, not out of anything "secular" or strict separation/anti-religion of the Michael Newdow stripe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPdIELOvJPU
All this would need to be part of a proper [not to mention charitable] rebuttal/clarification. Ritchie got a lot right about the presidential oath--a particular cause of yours
http://americancreation.blogspot.com/#uds-search-results
so I think your headline is gratuitously hard on him, as well as your expending 3 paragraphs of both your time and the reader's time impugning his credibility as a "go-to guy" for what amounts to not even a substantive error.
Good clarification, though, although I think you should have explained why the "so help me God" was likely deleted. As a "go-to guy" yourself in the current culture wars--such as Michael Newdow's--you owe the reader the same thoroughness that you demand from Ritchie here.
Merely reporting the fact that "so help me God" was deleted does not explain the issue sufficiently to the uninitiated.
Senate Historian Don Ritchie will retire on May 15. He served 40 years in the Senate Historical Office. He held the position of Senate Historian since 2009.
My first contact with Don Ritchie dates back to an email I sent on August 28, 2006 as was reported here (see Comment).
Here's part of his response back then:
"As a Senate historian, I have not made any survey of how presidents have taken the oath, although Washington’s biographers have indicated that on his own he added 'So help me God.' You’ll need to check their footnotes to find their sources."
It's, at least, good to know that since my first email the Senate Historical Office has looked more into the matter of how presidents have taken their oath.
The part, however, where Ritchie said, "Most presidents in the 19th Century did not repeat the oath, they just said, 'I do,'" is not supported by the facts. His speculation about "I do" comes only from a Wikipedia entry.
Thanks for sharing, nice post! Post really provice useful information!
FadoExpress là một trong những top công ty chuyển phát nhanh quốc tế hàng đầu chuyên vận chuyển, chuyển phát nhanh siêu tốc đi khắp thế giới, nổi bật là dịch vụ gửi hàng đi nhật và gửi hàng đi pháp và dịch vụ chuyển phát nhanh đi hàn quốc uy tín, giá rẻ
Post a Comment